28 February 2012

Cool it!


I was sitting here like the nerd I am, not thinking of the UofA basketball team or attractive ladies walking by, but of how to slow ischemic stroke and decrease the stroke infarct volume. A very simple idea popped into my head: hypothermia!  What do you do when you break your leg and it swells? You put ice on it! Why not do that to the brain?


It is also already known that many who suffer heart attacks or drowning in cold water have a much higher chance of survival than at non-hypothermic conditions. So I started my research and was actually very surprised to actually see people are studying/testing this. I had no idea this was an actual concept! **Victory dance that I actually had a good idea! <('-'<) <( '-' )> (>'-')> ***

One group studied two ways of cooling; surface cooling and endovascular cooling. Intravascular cooling is being studied now and is not included in this article. Both trials (surface and endovascular) results show the feasibility of the concept but cannot comment on the safety of the procedure. 

Models of temporary ischemia with administration of hypothermia show a reduction in infarct size and improvement in behavioral outcomes.They show that hypothermia initiated after 5 minutes of ischemic stroke onset protected the cortical ad hippocamplan neurons. However, hypothermia was not effective when initiated 30 minutes after. This is much different in animal studies. Both 2 and 6 hour delays show protective effects. A 22 hour delay showed to be even more neuroprotective.

They hypothesize that the mode of protection comes from the fact that it causes metabolic rate of the brain to slow as well as reduces release of inflammation markers and free radicals. I would imagine it would also help with reperfusion injury as well once the embolism is removed.

Surface cooling can use air blankets, water mattresses, alcohol bathing, cooling jackets, and ice packing. Advantages are its simplicity and ability to even be performed at home, in a crude way, while waiting for the ambulance. However, this takes several hours to reach the desired temperature.

Endovascular cooling uses catheters that can be inserted directly into the central venous system transferring heat via transduction through an internal circulation in the catheter. This is much quicker, tighter temperature control and reduces shivering quite a bit.

With either case passive re-warming is used afterwards. These therapies could be combined with neuroprotective agents to augment each other. 

http://stroke.ahajournals.org/content/38/2/794.long

3 comments:

  1. I think this is a really cool concept! For me personally, I know I like using cool packs for my forehead when I have a migraine, so I applaud Tim for looking into this for strokes. I like that both surface and more invasive procedures are discussed, because both really would have their advantages depending on the circumstance.I would like to see more studies done on whether cool temperatures really reduce the release of inflammation and free radical markers.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What other tests would you wish to have? We test the effect of cool temperatures on inflammation every day. When something swells up what do you put on it? I don't think its a question of if cool temperatures actually work but at what temperature works best and what side effects could occur.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is really interesting! It makes me wonder what else cooling could control. We've been talking about all the ties between inflammation and various disease states for the whole semester. The article states that a study by Wang et al found that 2 hours of hypothermia showed reduction of inflammation up to 1 week later. So, do you guys think that this could be used as a treatment for the other disease states we've talked about in class? Could once a week hypothermia treatment be beneficial? Of course, we'd have to figure out the side effects of long term treatment--I'm guessing we could see suppression of the immune system with regular treatment leading to susceptibility to viral and bacterial infection, but what else? Would the benefits outweigh the side effects? It would definitely be interesting to see!

    ReplyDelete